Is this the end of the road for restaurant chains like Pizza Hut and TGI Fridays?

Sign up to our free Brexit and beyond email for the latest headlines on what Brexit means for the UK.

Sign up to our Brexit email for the latest insights.

Sign up to our Brexit email for the latest insights.

FOr a generation of Englishmen, nothing said they liked the celebration at all. Pizza Hut. You knew you were in for a treat when your parents succumbed to the temptation of bottomless Pepsi, industrial-strength cheese and the social status of a trip to the salad bar. Or perhaps you remember the joys of a. TGI Fridays Where great burgers, sticky ribs and potato skins arrive with weaponized enthusiasm.

Chain restaurantOnce rock stars of British food, they now find themselves in retirement, their glory days behind them. Take Pizza Hut: its biggest UK franchisee is scrambling for cash, rising costs and the public’s newfound passion for artisanal sourdough. Prezzo has been closing branches faster than you can say “alforno” and TGI Fridays recently took an unwelcome spin through management.

Open the image in the gallery.

It’s impossible not to feel nostalgic on the news. The idea, of course, was an American export, with the first chain restaurant, VampyOpened here in 1954 – Pizza Hut didn’t open until 1973, a year before McDonald’s. But the chains were never about Michelin stars or locavore bragging rights. For many of us, they have been our first memories of hospitality. These are the places where we learned how to order from a menu, where a handful of greasy napkins and a Coca-Cola (full fat, of course) felt indulgent, and where unlimited ice cream was the height of sophistication. Hosting a primary school birthday was practically a rite of passage. These places introduced generations of Brits, even snobs, to the joys of eating out – cheap, reliable and a bit interesting. The kids loved it, the parents put up with it and no one complained about the bill. So what happened?

Quick answer: everything. Longest: Chains like Pizza Hut and TGI Fridays are up against the triple threat of rising costs, changing tastes and an economic environment that makes eating out as sensible as taking out a payday loan.

The hospitality industry has faced crises in the past few years. VAT was raised from 5 to 20 percent in post-pandemic reconstruction, just as businesses struggled to recover. Brexit Staff shortages, red tape around imports and a weak pound threw in. The war between Ukraine and Russia has driven up energy prices, while the cost of living crisis has made consumers tighten their belts.

Now, what? Budget With rising National Insurance Contributions (NICs) and higher wages being the last straw, hospitality has been hit hard. Pizza Hut’s biggest franchisee expects its annual costs to rise to £4m – a bill so high it is scrambling to find a buyer or new funding. And this is just one example of an industrial crisis. As Kate Nicholls, chief executive of UKHospitality, explains: “Hospitality is set for a £3.4bn cost increase as a result of the budget changes, and this will impact on jobs and increase prices, which we know will increase. There will be a struggle for customers.” For chains operating sprawling locations with legacy fares and hefty overheads, there’s no easy way to balance the books.

Fine dining establishments face similar pressures. For example, Marcus Wareing closed his eponymous restaurant at The Berkeley last year, citing challenges the industry could no longer ignore, and Michael Roux Jr.’s Le Guerrochet has more than 50 years of service. It later closed its doors in January. Wareing and Roux may operate in a different stratosphere than Pizza Hut, but their closings tell a similar story. As Nichols explains: “The reality is that businesses are unable to absorb more costs after spending so much over the past four years, and it’s customers and team members who will feel the impact.”

The question isn’t whether chains are in trouble — it’s whether the entire dining landscape is at breaking point. And for consumers who have long relied on the chains’ affordability and consistency, what happens when even these stalwarts begin to falter?

Open the image in the gallery.

chain The restaurant Designed for affordable, democratic places to eat. They weren’t about exclusivity or experience – they were there for Friday family dinners, motorway service stops and pre-cinema meals. But now a margherita at Pizza Hut will set you back £13.49. At Pizza Express, it’s £13.45. Compare that to Napoli on the Road in Chiswick, where Michele Pascarella – literally the best pizza chef in the world – charges £12.90. Or Crisp Pizza, consistently rated as one of London’s best, where a single classic pie costs just £12. Suddenly the allure of a full crust isn’t what it used to be.

The problem with chains is that they get stuck in the middle. They are too expensive to suit the budget but cannot match the quality or experience of independent candidates. Diners willing to spend more than £13 on a pizza are voting with their wallets for artisan toppings and perfectly blistered crusts, not the reliability of mildly hot pepperoni.

Consumers are left wondering what they are paying for. A key USP factor for chain restaurants has always been their predictability, but in today’s fast-paced dining landscape, that predictability is part of the problem. Diners want value for money, but value now also means quality ingredients, local sourcing and authenticity – the feeling that what you’re eating has been made with care and reflects the personality of the maker.

This is not a problem for all chains. The new kids on the block are doing better: the five boys saw revenues rise by more than £90m last year and, despite a small pre-tax loss, Franco Manca’s business grew by more than 20 per cent. Brands such as Nando’s and Wagamama have also cracked the code. Nando’s leans on its cheeky branding and addictive peri-peri and has reported just one loss in 2021, while Wagamama, which has seen a strong performance since going private last year, with plant-based bowls Keeps things fresh and health conscious. Both fares feel modern, relevant and, importantly, good value.

This is where chainsaws struggle to cope. Authenticity, by its very nature, is not something that is well measured. How can a restaurant feel personal when it’s one of 100 identical outlets, each with a different chef following the same formula? For independents, every dish tells a story – of a chef’s heritage, a local supplier or a family recipe. For chains, the story is usually one of consistency, and while that was once a strength, it now feels impersonal in a dining scene that prizes individuality.

For families who rely on chain restaurants as an affordable dining option, these changes sting. Independent candidates can do better. food But they’re not always accessible in small towns or suitable for budget-conscious diners. The concern isn’t just about fewer places to eat. It’s about the erosion of dining out as an accessible treat. “If the government wants to contain inflation, protect jobs and support business,” Nicholls stressed, “it must urgently review its changes to employer NICs.” It has pushed for measures such as new employer NICs bands for low earners or exemptions for part-time workers to protect both businesses and their employees.

Then there’s the problem of Instagram. When was the last time you saw a rail-waxing song about a Pizza Hut salad bar? Social media has revolutionized how people choose where to eat, and chains have largely failed to take advantage. Foodies scroll through their feeds for trending spots, viral dishes and aesthetic interiors. Compared to chains, it feels calm and uninspired, offering little to double-tap or share. Some have dipped their toes into social media campaigns – for example, Chipotle was the first chain to join TikTok, Nando’s launched a chat show about mental health and Leon’s partnered with Joe Wicks. — but they’ve struggled to create the kind of buzz that freelancers generate. Easily without a compelling visual or storytelling, the chainsaw journey feels less like an adventure and more like a fallback option.

Ironically, the biggest savior of chains in recent years has also been their demise. Delivery platforms such as Deliveroo and UberEats have allowed chains to move away from struggling dine-in models, building dark kitchens and revamping their menus for takeaway. For Pizza Hut, the turnaround is a tale of two businesses: HWS, which operates all of its dine-in restaurants in the UK, is struggling, while a number of its delivery outlets – operated by separate franchisees – are struggling. , not affected. But the rise of delivery has also turned dining into an entirely different experience — one where consistency matters less than quality, and price becomes the main selling point.

The chances are not very good. Legacy costs, a tough economic climate and the public’s desire for convenience have left many chains looking outdated. Pizza Hut operates large, expensive locations designed for a different era. Independents, meanwhile, are lean and sophisticated, with smaller spaces and hyper-focused menus. It’s no wonder they can do better for less. They are walking the same tightrope with rising energy bills and ingredient prices. The difference is that they’ve got speed. Diners are rooting for them. Chains? Not so much.

Still, it’s hard to let go. Chain restaurants weren’t perfect, but they didn’t need to be. They were there for first dates, family birthdays and layover pit stops. They were the backdrop to a million little moments, the kind of places you didn’t even think about, suddenly gone.

Perhaps the future of chains lies in finding a way to tap into that nostalgia without clinging to the past – a way to recapture the joy of dining out for families and first-time diners, and that quality and uniqueness. By embracing what consumers need now. Because if they can’t evolve, they risk becoming exactly what no restaurant ever wants to be: a childhood memory.