Federal Minister for Information and Broadcasting Ataullah Tarard has said that the federal government has dismissed the news that the federal government has rejected the news of the party’s civil disobedience with the Pakistan Tehreek -e -Insaf (PTI). No formal dialogue started. Former ruling party.
The Prime Minister said that no meeting was held between Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif and National Assembly Speaker Ayaz Sadiq at his residence. Geo News The program with Shahbaz Khanzada today on Wednesday.
The Minister’s Explanation between the Speaker of the National Assembly and PTI leaders, including Asad Qaiser, Omar Ayub and Sunni Unity Council (SIC) chairman Sahibzada Hamid Raza. The meeting has come out.
After the important meeting, the PTI and the government agreed to sit at the negotiating table without a pre -condition before the former civil disobedience movement, insiders said.
Sources added that the meeting took place after a telephonic contact between Caesar and Sadiq.
In his television interview today, Tarad noted that Assad Qaiser was not present at the National Assembly Speaker’s residence when Prime Minister Shahbaz went to condole the speaker’s sister’s death.
He further explained that whenever there are informal exchange, formal dialogue between the two sides has not begun, adding that neither communication sources have been restored with the party led by Imran Khan’s leadership. Has started negotiations.
The PML -N politician emphasized the need to express regret and apologize over the events that took place on May 9 and November 26 on PTI, false story to damage the state’s reputation. Accused of fabrication.
He asked who would trust the PTI and who would guarantee his reputation. “They are trying to avoid their political failures. How can anyone trust the PTI or their guarantee? He asked.
Referring to the PTI’s “Crow or Muro” march launched on November 24, Tarad also pointed out that the party was told that he could not be assembled at D Chowk in Islamabad, he added. There is all evidence of the opposition party’s actions. Government
Tarad also criticized the former ruling party for using provincial resources to attack the federal government, adding that he withdrew his position during the debate on the 26th Constitutional Amendment.